Our
courts are
either corrupt or
there is something
seriously
wrong with the
regulations to
permit
sitting duck
loans. You too, could
be a victim of
Identity
Theft.
On January
30th, 2009 the
Ontario
Court of
Appeal's
decision
(Docket:
C49171) in the
Tony Crawford
- Bank of
Montreal case,
resulted in
Mr. Crawford
having a debt
estimated at
$250,000,00
without a
trail. Take a
look at "The
Tony Crawford
Story.
I was not stunned
or shocked
when I
witnessed the
decision being
handed down to
deny a trial
in this
matter.
I expected
it.
However, after
listening to
Mr. Crawford's
lawyer state
his case, I
thought to
myself,
"yes
there will be
a trial, there
has to
be."
Mr. Crawford's
lawyer did an
excellent job
of presenting
the facts in
this matter, despite
being allowed
only twenty
minutes to do
so. The Bank
of Montreal's
lawyers did
not even have
to make a
case. How
come? It
is just not
that simple a
case, unless
the decision
to deny the
trial was
pre-determined
and that is
what I
think,
It appears to
me, our court
system is
corrupt.
The
three judges
recessed for
10 minutes
after Mr.
Crawford's lawyer made
his
case.
When they
returned with
their decision, denying
Tony Crawford access to the
justice
system, I
sensed there
was a fix on.
The
fix I assume
was "no
way, this case
could go to
trail."
It is too
similar to
Asset Backed
Commercial
Paper Loans
used by the
banks. It
is also an
exact match to
the number one
tax evasion
scam at the
top of the 'Dirty
Dozen'
list in the US
IRS
website:
If Mr.
Crawford was
granted a
trial,
then all banks
in Canada
could be
questioned and
subjected to
fraud
charges for
their
practices of
Identity theft,
which is
exactly what
happened to
Mr. Crawford.
After
studying all
the facts and
I hope you
will too, it
is clear Mr.
Crawford was a
victim of more
than just
identity
theft. He is also a
victim of a
corrupt court
system in
Canada or
Government
system
designed to
protect the
world's most
powerful
elite's
control over
the Canadian
banking
system,
through
democracy
Chinese style.
Despite
a third
reading of www.Petition44.com
at Queen's
Park for an
investigation
into identity
theft and
predatory
lending
practices -
there are
several
worrying
aspects from a
case history
ten-years in
litigation
involving nine
judges in six
hearings.
The
main point is,
Canadian
courts brush aside
crime
as 'Buyer
Beware' that
allows con
artists to
continue to
take advantage
of an easy
scam with no
recourse.
There are no regulations for
consumer
protection and
people find
themselves in debt
to trick loans.
The Canadian court system refuses
to deal with
banks that
collude with
third parties
selling sleazy
tax shelter
schemes. In my
opinion
signature
theft is a
crime that
takes
possession of
a person's
property by
fraudulent misrepresentations
in financial
markets.
Crawford's
'Buyer Beware'
case is one of
many a Toronto
Star article refers
to as
'Borrower
Beware'
concerning
other debtors
trick into
debt to bank
loans behind
investment
schemes. The
courts find no
fault with
banks when
people
signatures on
investment
contracts are transformed
into
additional
personal loans
processed
outside the
scope of
banking
regulations -
it can happen to
anyone.
It is clear
people will
continue to be
victims of a
type of fraud
evidenced in
the scope of
the global
credit crunch.
It is also
clear
Canadians are
denied their
right to a
trial. It is
clear
Canadians are
denied a right
to have their allegations
followed up.
It
has been a 9
year struggle
for Tony and
he proves his
point.
This beyond
doubt. His
well
documented
evidence
is
published in
his books and
on his
websites.
The
bottom line is
"He
states he was
a victim of a
sitting duck
loan
conspiracy
backed by the
Bank of
Montreal."
All he wants
is a chance in
court to prove
he would never
have committed
to the
original
investment if
he had to put
up the
collateral
which he never
had to back up
a loan for
$110,000.00 in
the first
place.
He certainly
has made his
point well
enough to have
had a trial.
The
essence of
their decision
(I assume) was
based on the
the fact that
Tony failed to
read the loan
documentation
- the
perfect sting
of Identity
Theft and the
fact that the
loan
documentation
makes it clear
that there is
no genuine
issue for a
trial in
relation to
the Bank of
Montreal.
Tony
needs all
Canadians to
know and
support
him. He
is not a
quitter.
He will seek
advice from
his lawyer on how
to appeal the decision that
we now have.
A
total of five
judges ruling
on the case
rather that
the elements
of the case
raising issues
for a trial. The result is
debt without
trial.
|
